Menu

Supervisory & Advisory Boards

B

There’s been a lot of debate in some activist investor circles recently about reshaping the concept of supervisory boards which have been around for years and establishing them to oversee the governance of the elected corporate boards of directors. In some instances they’ve even given them fancy titles such as “Advisory Boards” to try and distinguish them from the old type supervisory boards which had a place and still do with startups or SME type businesses. To my surprise there have been a few of these supervisory boards established mainly in government owned enterprises or larger private companies but to date from my experience they have all been paper tigers without teeth. I have spoken with some of those individuals who have taken up directorships on these supervisory boards and without exception they have expressed total frustration at the constant friction between the corporate board and the supervisory board as a result of no clear demarcation of roles nor accountability resulting in dual responsibilities.

To me the justification for the appointment of a supervisory board sends a strong signal that the shareholders are not satisfied with the corporate board’s performance; otherwise what justification is there for having a supervisory board? It also indicates that the shareholders haven't the intestinal fortitude to front up and tackle the real problem which is the poor director appointments which they, the shareholders, made to the corporate board. In addition it’s simply adding another layer of accountability and responsibility on corporate business models which in most cases need trimming not enlarging. From my experience I would never accept an appointment either as Chairman or director of a corporate board which had a supervisory board structure for the following reasons:

  1. the shareholders as a group would have to be dysfunctional, weak and lacking purpose to resort to appointing a supervisory board and thus would in all probability be difficult to deal with.
  2. as a chairman of a corporate board to whom am I accountable, the shareholders or the supervisory board? In the examples I’ve witnessed mainly in government enterprises this is an extremely grey area with, in some cases, both boards reporting separately to the shareholders;
  3. which board has the ultimate responsibility for company performance? Dual accountability never works, hence the very quick demise of matrix management which was the darling of the academics in the nineties;
  4. who is the arbitrator when there is disagreement between the two boards on strategic matters? Or is it a divide and conquer philosophy by the shareholders? And;
  5. who controls the executive? I've witnessed and been called in as an independent expert to resolve this problem on a number of occasions where supervisory boards were involved.

In summary, perhaps supervisory boards would work if there were clear and irrefutable guidelines regarding responsibilities and accountabilities. However the question remains - "what is their purpose and how will the enterprise benefit from this additional layer of oversight?"

To me supervisory boards are a nonsense. Give me a totally independent board with sound professional governance practices dictating professional board behavior and which include positive shareholder communication guidelines and clear demarcation of accountability. Such boards with strong leadership from the Chairman result in harmonious collective boards striving for best practice and leading the company to achieve its main objective which is to establish a sound operational and financial platform while increasing shareholders wealth.

"To me the justification for the appointment of a supervisory board sends a strong signal that the shareholders are not satisfied with the corporate board’s performance; otherwise what justification is there for having a supervisory board?"

Stay in
the loop

Fill out the form to subscribe to our newsletter. Keep up to date with news and insights from our partners.

Newsletter

Subscribe